[wp-rss-aggregator feeds=”law360-international-arbitration”]
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Google Tag Manager simplifies the management of marketing tags on your website without code changes.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
Google Maps is a web mapping service providing satellite imagery, real-time navigation, and location-based information.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
LinkedIn Insight is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Service URL: www.linkedin.com (opens in a new window)
The article discusses several recent developments in the world of international arbitration. It covers topics such as the ongoing dispute in a $110 million coal company case, the need for improved oversight of arbitrators by the American Arbitration Association, and the arbitration of a travel insurance fee dispute involving Airbnb.
Additionally, the article examines the impact of the Supreme Court's recent decision on the Administrative Procedure Act and the ongoing legal battle related to Spain's arbitration awards.
The article also delves into the analysis of arbitral disputes, highlighting a "beacon of hope" in the Blasket case, as well as the conflict questions surrounding the Chilean bronze medal case.
Furthermore, the article reports on the U.S. Treasury Department's sanctions imposed on a Houthi network, as well as the recent additions to the Johannesburg office of Baker McKenzie.
The article discusses court rulings related to arbitration, including Discover's inability to arbitrate fraud risk claims, but American Express's ability to do so. It also covers a case where former attorneys from Drew Eckl are seeking to escape arbitration with a new firm.
The article concludes with a mention of the 3rd Circuit's ongoing consideration of a related matter.
