By Davy Karkason
Founding Attorney

Transnational Matters PLLC is pleased to announce an ICC arbitration victory in a complex, high-stakes cross-border dispute. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) administered the international arbitration. This result further reinforces the firm’s strength in handling such disputes. The arbitration, conducted under ICC Case No. 29080/XZG, involved parties from the United States and the United Kingdom. Moreover, the case proceeded under the ICC’s expedited procedure framework. The ICC Tribunal rendered its Final Award on January 20, 2026, bringing the dispute to a definitive and binding conclusion.

The Dispute Behind the ICC Arbitration Victory

The case involved a sophisticated cross-border transaction centered on a Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) arrangement. It required navigating contractual breaches, evidentiary challenges, and competing legal theories, including breach of contract and unjust enrichment. After a review of the factual record and submissions, the Tribunal ultimately found that the evidence did not establish breach of contract damages. Nevertheless, it found unjust enrichment on the respondent’s part and ordered restitution accordingly.

Davy Karkason, Esq., served as first chair in the arbitration. He led the strategy, advocacy, and execution of the case from inception through final award. His leadership ensured a precise and disciplined legal approach. As a result, the team successfully advanced alternative legal theories that ultimately secured recovery. This ICC arbitration victory highlights the importance of strategic claim structuring in international arbitration. That lesson applies especially where primary claims may face evidentiary limitations.

The Tribunal’s Award and Costs Decision

In its dispositive order, the Tribunal awarded USD $530,969.15 in unjust enrichment damages. The award carries interest at 8.107% per annum under Hong Kong law from the relevant date until full payment. In addition, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay USD $29,883.96 in legal costs and fees. It also ordered payment of the full ICC arbitration costs of USD $53,600. Consequently, the total financial recovery exceeds USD $614,000 plus accruing interest.

Why This Result Matters for Cross-Border Disputes

This result shows the effectiveness of ICC arbitration as a mechanism for resolving complex international disputes. ICC arbitration offers finality, enforceability under the New York Convention, and a neutral forum for cross-border conflicts. It also shows the value of experienced counsel who can adapt legal theories and maximize recovery through alternative claims. Indeed, that flexibility matters when traditional breach arguments alone may not suffice.

Transnational Matters PLLC continues to represent clients globally in ICC, ICSID, ICDR, and LCIA arbitrations. The firm delivers strategic, results-driven advocacy in international commercial and investment disputes.

If your business faces a cross-border contract or letter of credit dispute, early claim strategy can shape the recovery available. Contact our team to discuss whether ICC arbitration fits your situation.

About the Author
As a lawyer and the founder of Transnational Matters, Davy Aaron Karkason represents numerous international companies and a wide variety of industries in Florida, the U.S., and abroad. He is dedicated to fighting against unjust expropriation and unfair treatment of any individual or entity involved in an international matter. Mr. Karason received his B.A. in Political Science & International Relations with a Minor in Criminal Justice from Nova Southeastern University. If you have any questions about this article you can contact Davy Karkason through our contact page.