Piercing the Corporate Veil
By Davy Karkason
Founding Attorney

Piercing the Corporate Veil is a legal concept that involves disregarding the separate legal entity of a company, allowing individuals to be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of the corporation. It is a complex and highly debated topic in international law, with each country having its own unique set of rules and criteria. In this blog post, we will explore the elements required to prove veil piercing under international law, including the different tests and factors that must be considered.

Introduction to Piercing the Corporate Veil in International Law

Before diving into the elements of corporate veil piercing, it is essential to understand the concept’s background. The corporate veil is a legal fiction that separates a company’s legal identity from that of its owners and shareholders. This concept is vital to the functioning of modern economies and allows individuals to limit their personal liability for business activities. However, in cases where a company engages in suspect or fraudulent activities, the corporate veil can be pierced. Veil piercing can be initiated by a creditor, regulator, shareholder, or any party that can demonstrate a legitimate interest. See Piercing the Corporate Veil | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

Elements Required to Prove Corporate Veil Piercing

To prove corporate veil piercing, several elements must be present. Firstly, it must be shown that the company is merely a facade or a tool for its owners to conduct their activities without assuming any personal liability. Secondly, there must be a causal link between this facade and the harm or losses suffered by the claimant. Thirdly, the parties seeking to pierce the veil must demonstrate that the company’s separate legal identity is being used to commit an injustice or an abuse of rights. Finally, the court must be satisfied that the piercing of the corporate veil is necessary to protect the rights of the claimant and that no alternative remedies are available.

Different Tests and Factors to Consider in Corporate Veil Piercing

International law has developed several tests or factors to be considered when deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil. These include the ‘alter ego’ or ‘unity of interest’ test, which examines whether the company and its owners/shareholders are essentially the same entity. Another is the ‘instrumentality’ test, which seeks to show that the company is nothing more than a tool for its owners to achieve their purposes. Factors that are considered include the level of control exercised by the owners, the commingling of corporate and personal assets, and whether the company has been used fraudulently.

Case Studies and Examples of Corporate Veil Piercing

Corporate veil piercing cases can be found in a variety of industries and situations. In one high-profile case, a large oil and gas company was found guilty of environmental damage in the Amazon rainforest, and the directors and shareholders were held personally liable for the damages. In another example, a group of investors sued the owners of a real estate company, alleging that they had abused the company’s legal structure to deprive investors of their rights. This shows that Courts and Tribunals must balance the interests of the claimant with the importance of preserving the corporate form and limited liability.


In conclusion, grounding in international law is essential to pierce the corporate veil as different countries have their own unique criteria and rules. Although Veil Piercing is a complicated legal process, it has proved to be effective in holding individuals accountable for the wrongdoing of the corporation. Courts must consider the context of each case and balance the interests of the claimant with the importance of preserving the corporate form and limited liability. Piercing the corporate veil is not a step that should be taken lightly, but when necessary, it can provide a powerful tool for justice. Contact our office for more information on international veil piercing. We will be happy to help guide you through the process. Contact Our Office – Transnational Matters

About the Author
As a lawyer and the founder of Transnational Matters, Davy Aaron Karkason represents numerous international companies and a wide variety of industries in Florida, the U.S., and abroad. He is dedicated to fighting against unjust expropriation and unfair treatment of any individual or entity involved in an international matter. Mr. Karason received his B.A. in Political Science & International Relations with a Minor in Criminal Justice from Nova Southeastern University. If you have any questions about this article you can contact Davy Karkason through our contact page.